![Safeguarding the merit system: a review of the U.S. Office of Special Counsel: hearing before the Oversight of Government Management](//coverdb.com/reviewUS/w100/13f/9781234325206.jpg) |
|
Safeguarding the merit system: a review of the U.S. Office of Special Counsel: hearing before the Oversight of Government Management
United States. Congress. Senate
Paperback. Books LLC, Reference Series 2011-10-02.
ISBN 9781234325206
|
|
|
Buy from Amazon.com
|
Publisher description
Original publisher: Washington : U.S. G.P.O. : For sale by the Supt. of Docs., U.S. G.P.O., 2005. LC Number: KF26 .H636 2005c OCLC Number: (OCoLC)61432151 Subject: Whistle blowing -- Law and legislation -- United States. Excerpt: ... 11 We realize the 10 days seemed rather harsh and we immediately gave in, in fact, on the recommendation of our human resource manager who told us originally 10 days was what the case law said was permissible and that is what we understood. We also felt, and I want to make sure that everyone understands this on the Sub-committee, that we were not going to just give them 10 days. They also had all kinds of time to make a decision, even if they decided to initially determine they might want to go, and most of them did say they probably did, that they could always change their mind without any harm to them or any effect, and we were going to work with them at all levels to try to facilitate a good result for them. Indeed, I want to clarify for the record that each of these employ-ees we were very concerned about and we made recommendations to them for other Federal employment. When we had the oppor-tunity we gave them very high recommendations. We had nothing but good will towards them. They were excellent people who had excellent records and we simply had a difference of opinion about management style perhaps, but it was nothing more than that. I want to assure this Subcommittee that there is no truth whatso-ever to that aspect of the question. With regard to why we opened the Detroit office, we did not seize on Detroit as a city that we were looking for, but rather we talked to employees - - Senator V. What I would like to know is why did you OINOVICH not choose Cleveland. Mr. B. We tried, Senator, and your wonderful State of Ohio. LOCH We actually have people from Ohio who came into our Agency after I came aboard and they were wanting Cleveland or Columbus. Un-fortunately, GSA was in the driver's seat for us on this issue. We want
More books by United States. Congress. Senate
Similar books
Rate the book
Write a review and share your opinion with others. Try to focus on the content of the book. Read our instructions for further information.
Safeguarding the merit system: a review of the U.S. Office of Special Counsel: hearing before the Oversight of Government Management
Book reviews » Safeguarding the merit system: a review of the U.S. Office of Special Counsel: hearing before the Oversight of Government Management
|
|
![Safeguarding the merit system: a review of the U.S. Office of Special Counsel: hearing before the Oversight of Government Management](/images/background.gif) |
![Safeguarding the merit system: a review of the U.S. Office of Special Counsel: hearing before the Oversight of Government Management](/images/background.gif) |
|
|
|